Judging the ‘judge not’ notion

November 4th, 2009 by E. Stephen Burnett 1 comment

Of all the Christian myths out there, this one is surely among the big kahunas.

One might even argue it’s the biggest — at the very top of a top-ten list of Christian myths. In fact, if we can’t see its un-Biblical basis, we may not see the un-Biblical basis of anything.

The Bible has 774,746 words. This error comes from just two, ripped screaming from context.

Ye have heard that it was said …

judgmental_judgeThe Bible says: “Judge not”!

AKA: The Bible says not to judge.

AKA: Christians are so judgmental.

Figure A:

A ranting fundie street preacher1 is hollering in a secular university’s free-speech area. He catches the attention of some, the derision of most. One girl passing by think she’ll try a little drive-by shot. “The Bible says not to judge!” she blurts, and then goes on, very satisfied with her deep knowledge of Scripture.

Figure B:

Some Christian-spirituality book author, or sermon preacher, decries the image Christians have in the world. We’re too often seen as being judgmental, the leader proclaims. We need to be more loving. We need to win people with love. The Bible says, “Judge not.”

Figure C:

Christians: Since the bible says NOT to judge, why are you always judging Pagans?2

From Yahoo Answers, mid-October 2009 3

What’s the truth in this?

Judging someone for being guilty of a sin must be done with care for at least three reasons:

  1. Those who practice the same sins for which they condemn others risk God’s judgment; He is the ultimate judge (Romans 2: 1-2). That counts for sins against Him, and sins against each other — true judgment and repayment of personal wrongs is up to God, not us (Romans 12:19).
  2. Sharing truth must be done with a spirit of humility and love (even if it’s tough love). All Christians have been guilty of the same kinds of evils as everyone else. The only difference is that God has saved His people from those consequences (1 Corinthians 6: 9-11).
  3. Judgment should be done more in the Church than in the world, the Apostle Paul says strongly (1 Corinthians 5: 12-13). This is done to protect the boundaries of the Church, where immorality would defame the Name of Christ and must not be tolerated. To an extent, outsiders are expected to have immoral behavior. Still, that does not mean we must never point that out.

What’s the lie in this?

judgmental_card

  1. No judging allowed never ever is nowhere near what Scripture says. The whole Scripture and hundreds of separate passages assume the idea that judging is necessary. More on this below.
  2. No judging allowed never ever is rarely people’s real meaning anyway. Few in practice truly mean Never judge anyone for any belief or action. Rather, it’s a card played for personal use: Don’t judge me, at least not what I’m saying now. Logically, that backfires and utterly fails.

But we needn’t even delve into all those other passages yet. Matthew 7 itself rebuts the wrong.

What’s the Word?

[Jesus speaking] “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.”

Matthew 7: 1-6

Two words: “Judge not”? Try reading the other 103: Christians must evaluate their own hearts before pointing out sins in others. Going from point A to point B without taking out the plank in your own eye makes little sense (note how Jesus’ hyperbole still translates to the present day). But Jesus never says always avoid point B, removing someone else’s speck. Instead, work on yourself first. “Then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.”

“Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you. [. . .]

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits.”

Matthew 7: 15-16

If somehow Jesus really had meant never to judge someone, by his actions or character, these verses would make no sense. To avoid giving holy things to mangy dogs or pearls to uncaring pigs, you must judge what/who is a dog or pig. Watching for false prophets requires judging.

Elsewhere, Christ Himself and epistle writers go into detail about how that looks.

Further in

The Bible is clear that Christians can and should make spiritual judgments for three reasons: to love their fellow believers and guard the glory of God; to prevent lies and their resulting evils from infesting the Church; and to emulate Jesus Himself, Who loved both grace and truth.

1. Right judgment is loving and guards God’s glory.

Too often no-judging critics treat Christian criticism of them as if it’s always about merely personal wrongs. But for matters of morality and Law, God sets the standard. If a Christian talks about the standard, he’s just the messenger.

If you saw someone trespassing on government property, it would be wrong and unloving for you not to warn him he will be shot by snipers or electrocuted if he goes further 4. Similarly, Christians who don’t act as if they do believe practicing sin will condemn a person to God’s “wrath and fury” (Romans 2: 3-5) would be hypocritical, anti-God and unloving.

For this reason, Paul in 1 Corinthians 5 judges all over the place. A man is shacking up with his stepmother and not being called on it, acting as though this is normal for a claimed Christian. Danger! Following the right process and throwing him out is necessary to protect the reputation of a local church and preserve the holiness of Christ’s Name. The idea is not just punishment — it is tough love. Maybe he will stop having his sin enabled, and come back and repent.

2. Not judging sins allows lies and hypocrisy to infest the Church.

One wonders if non-Christians who use the don’t-judge-ever canard take the time to think: if taken to its logical conclusion, actual tolerance (that is, peaceful coexistence with different beliefs) will go down. The hypocrisy in the church you claim you hate will skyrocket.

Failure to judge implies to the world Christians aren’t serious about sin — either in their own congregations, or in the sight of the Creator/Savior they claim to represent.

If you overcorrect for hypocritical standards or judging toward having no standards or judging at all, sure, you may allow for greater belief-diversity among “Christians.” But what you also allow is behavior like lies, backstabbing, verbal abuse, actual dangerous intolerance and thumbed noses at God’s real rules. What would keep a “Christian” from shacking up with his stepmother or a pastor with a secretary? Or a deacon from downloading child porn? Judge not.

Jesus judged people all the time — not just the Pharisees. He also encouraged His people to judge with righteous judgment, but only after first ensuring they are not guilty of the same sin.

Paul and other epistle writers did the same. Christians have the Spirit, the mind of Christ, which helps them make spiritual judgments (1 Corinthians 2: 12-16). At many points they refer to the bad guys by their very names, right there in public, such as in 1 Timothy 2:20 or Paul’s criticism of Peter himself in Galatians 2: 11-24.5 After all, public error sometimes needs a public correction. If you sweep public error under the rug and don’t deal with it openly, people won’t see justice done right — when they need to. Even worse, if someone is called down for sin or error and goes on to repent, no one will see that either.

And that gives quite the lie to false Christian teachers who, when confronted with public criticism, whine about how the critic didn’t come to them personally first before taking it public.6 If the offense were personal, there are Biblical ways of dealing with that (Matthew 18: 15-20). But for more-serious offenses against God and His truth, taking it public has Biblical precedent.

3. We must follow Christ Himself, Who brings both grace and truth.

Christ was full of grace and truth (John 1:14). His message was not just “Believe and follow Me,” but first “repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15). If we as Christians want to avoid the truth parts (you are a sinner) and show only grace (Christ can forgive you) that grace is worthless. Who cares for forgiveness for sins he doesn’t know about? By acting this way, we fail to show all of God’s nature to people. He is not only kind and loving, He is holy and hates sin.

Says author Randy Alcorn:

Some people hate truth. Others hate grace. Jesus loves both. We can’t undercut either without undercutting Him.

So we have to make a choice. Are we going to spend our lives trying to please the grace-haters or the truth-haters? Or are we going to seek to please the only One whose judgment seat we’ll stand before: Jesus, who is full of grace and truth? 7

So, for the sake of God’s glory and loving others, the purity of His people’s beliefs and holiness, and to emulate the example of Christ Himself …

Make sure you’re not judging hypocritically. Daily do spiritual surgery on your own eye-planks. But don’t blind yourself to others’ specks — either by your own sin, or by some “spiritual” notion of I Mustn’t Judge. See the evil in the world for what it is and be grieved by it. God will punish sin. And sin comes from false beliefs. What would be truly unloving is never to share those truths with others, because we’re selfishly fearful of being seen as the unloving bad guys.

On the flip side, anger against sin can come from God-given repulsion to anything He also hates, but pity for people must accompany that anger. Christians have all been guilty of the same sins and all deserve His wrath. It’s only due to His grace that we have been saved from anything!

  1. The one I saw had issues in other areas, such as believing Christians after they’re saved become perfect in literal practice as well as by God’s legal proclamation. Somehow I don’t think that will help with sharing truth with others humbly.
  2. It is just slightly irritating when non-Christians try to tell Christians what the Bible “really” says or how Jesus would “really” react to such-and-such a situation, et cetera. Hey, we don’t tell you what pagans should “really” believe to be real-deal pagans. Let’s make a deal: you stop twisting Jesus’ words, and we’ll stop spreading the wrong view that all Pagans directly worship Satan and have no morals (albeit they have no basis for morals, even if they do have them).
  3. “Best Answer, chosen by asker: They have a malleable understanding of the word ‘judge.’” Question for Pagans: if you believe it’s wrong to judge, why do you judge Christians when they judge you? Perhaps it is actually your understanding of the term that is “malleable”?
  4. Cultural-fundie Christians in their warning may imply: “I hate it when you trespass on my land!” Liberal/emerg*** Christian (in name only?) activists: “I wouldn’t go there, but maybe God will save you anyway; I mustn’t judge you and instead I must love you, while you’re getting shot.” Other religions: “If you work really hard while trespassing, maybe you won’t get shot at all.” New Agers and others: “Bullets are an illusion.” Atheists: “That property is mine because I think so; therefore there is no such thing as an angry government firing bullets because I don’t see them yet.”
  5. Hymenaeus and Alexander need to get their own website — Hymenaeus.com, perhaps — and sell several hundred thousand books accusing Paul of being unloving and non-missional and unnecessarily alienating Peter and not understanding the “wider mercy” of God even to those who dismiss His truth.
  6. Figure D: “We need to treat others with the same courtesy and kindness we’d like them to extend to us, following Matthew 18 when we have a disagreement,” writes patriocentrist lady-leader Jeannie Chancey (“Don’t Believe Everything You Read…”, LadiesAgainstFeminism.com, March 9, 2009). “Publicly airing disagreements online or off is not only unbiblical, it is just plain crass and rude. Far better to pursue private communication and reconciliation …” Chancey is putting legalistic stuff online for men and women and playing by public-teacher rules, but ordering her critics to play only by private-reconciliation Matthew-18 rules. If only Peter (Galatians 2) had known that trick, we could all be safely kowtowing today to legalistic Judaizers whenever they’re in the room.
  7. Randy Alcorn, The Grace and Truth Paradox, page 26 (Multnomah, 2003)

One response

  1. [...] Judging the “judge not” notion, YeHaveHeard.com, Nov. 4, 2009. ↩ [...]

What do you think?